As dystopia becomes the new normal, further policy easing will be required

Mark Dowding 80 x 80.jpg
Mark Dowding
April 24, 2020

Investors settle in for a protracted fight against the virus and look to the ECB to increase its support measures in line with the US.

Developments in energy markets and EU politics have provided the focus for market attention over the past week. From a historical point of view, this will be remembered as the week when oil prices traded in negative territory with West Texas crude dropping as low as -USD40 per barrel into the contract expiry.

Oil shocks exceed expectations

We had flagged the risk of a negative oil price in our 3 April commentary as it had become apparent that any measures to curtail supply have been insufficient to correct for the drop in demand that has resulted from the economic lockdown in place across much of the globe.

A shortage of storage always suggested to us that negative oil prices were a risk in the short term, yet the magnitude of the collapse in the front contract still took us by surprise and constituted yet another ‘black swan’ event, of the type that seems to be occurring all too frequently these days.

Going forward, we believe that downward pressure on oil could continue and there may be further downside in the contracts expiring in the next few months, though as supply responds, prices above USD35 are likely during 2021, as long as the global economy is in recovery from the Covid-19 crisis at that point.

Meanwhile, the oil price rout may serve as a reminder that all is certainly not well in the global economy, notwithstanding the recent asset price recovery in financial markets. It also highlights the perils associated with products such as ETFs.

Whilst the oil price can trade negative, ETF prices cannot, hence, were there a renewed drop in oil prices, there is a risk that ETF losses could be left with arranger banks – calling their viability into question.

Movement in oil prices saw US equity prices dip during the middle of the week before recovering to settle close to the point marking the 50% retracement of the year-to-date sell-off. These moves saw other risk assets also trade somewhat softer in the past week with investment grade, high yield and emerging market (EM) credit spreads giving up some of their April gains.

Is ECB action enough?

Sentiment in Europe was overshadowed by weakness in periphery spreads in the run-up to the EU leaders’ summit. After the European Central Bank (ECB) announced the EUR700bn PEPP in March, spreads in the region initially reacted positively.

However, doubts have subsequently grown that this policy action was inadequate – especially in comparison to the much larger intervention coming from the US Federal Reserve (Fed). This has been compounded by a jump in new issuance volumes in the eurozone sovereign market and increasingly the market is concluding that the size of the PEPP is insufficient, as things stand.

We would argue that the ECB should be seeking to deliver de facto yield curve control, such that it is supporting accommodative financial conditions to help the eurozone economy at a time when fiscal policy should be as expansionary as needed.

However, yield curve control needs to be applied to all yield curves in the eurozone – not just German Bunds. If not, it will likely see a tightening of financial conditions in the periphery choke off any hope for economic recovery in those countries like Italy and Spain, which have been worst affected by the crisis.

In this context, it arguably is the job of the ECB to control spreads at this time – and so Christine Lagarde’s comments at the last press conference – that she did not think that this was her job – continue to damn her in the eyes of the market and offer encouragement to those wanting to take short positions in the periphery in the hope that an inadequate ECB response will encourage a break-up of the eurozone.

Consequently, the ECB will, in our view, need to spend many billions more correcting Lagarde’s mistake if it is to change perceptions among the eurosceptics. An announcement this week that the ECB would start accepting collateral from fallen angels, whose ratings drop below investment grade, was another positive incremental step.

However, in order to convince markets of their intent to deliver monetary stability, it may be necessary for the ECB to announce a doubling in the volume of the PEPP when it meets for its regular monetary policy meeting next week.

Recovery views yet to rationalise

In some parts of the eurozone, it may appear that policymakers are still somewhat naïve with respect to the gravity of the economic situation being faced. As it becomes apparent that life won’t be able to return to normal any time soon, with social distancing measures continuing to disrupt our lives for many months to come, it seems that some are too quick to assume that there will be a rapid bounce back with a ‘V’ shaped recovery.

However, as we have suggested over the past few weeks, it appears that GDP in the US and eurozone is unlikely to breach end-2019 output levels until the middle of 2022 at the earliest. It has also been somewhat disheartening to see too many political leaders pandering to domestic considerations, at a time when solidarity and leadership at a regional level is sorely needed.

From a fiscal standpoint, slow progress with respect to an EU Recovery Fund may yet make for an impressive headline number, but the details are likely to be more underwhelming, given this will probably assume 6x of leverage are applied to a much smaller number coming from the EU budget.

This said, policy easing is being delivered incrementally – even if it lacks the speed and scale of what has been announced across the Atlantic.

EU solidity is challenged

In observing the EU over recent years, the mechanics of decision-making can seem slow and cumbersome. At the same time, the EU has tended to manage to take the right steps in the end. Consequently, we are unlikely to have seen the end of the policy support that will eventually be extended and policy options certainly have not been exhausted.

Ultimately, we think that the biggest threat to eurozone stability will come from politics. At a time when economic hardship means that citizens will be looking for scapegoats to blame, the biggest risk is if voters in countries like Italy determine that the EU is culpable. This could encourage Salvini and La Lega to stand on a eurosceptic platform, yet that is more of a risk heading into 2022, rather than in the near term.

Aside from this, our belief that the EU will hold together and ‘do whatever it takes’ suggests that we should look for spreads in the region to tighten in the weeks ahead. Eurosceptics are wrong to worry about debt-to-GDP ratios, in our view (these are considerably high in a country like Japan than Italy), and Italy’s debt is absolutely sustainable as long as borrowing costs are not permitted to spiral higher.

In this context, we believe that sovereign credit ratings should continue to benefit from euro-area support and whilst a downgrade in Italy to low BBB may be likely later in the year, we cannot foresee Italy’s credit rating slipping below investment grade ahead of the next national election.

Therefore, we retain a constructive view on spreads and have been adding exposure in the past week following recent widening, on the belief that the playbook which has worked consistently in the eurozone government bond market over the past 10-years will continue to hold this time around – not least because Covid-19 is a common threat, rather than a development which any particular country should feel any blame for.

By comparison, newsflow in US markets has been relatively muted in the past week. Measures to supply liquidity have seen 3-month Libor rates decline to 1.04% (the lowest level since 17 March), yet unsecured cash rates continue to trade at a substantial premium versus secured cash rates when the effective Fed Funds rate is just 0.05%.

Crude impacts currencies

In FX, oil-related currencies have been under some pressure and with more EM central banks easing monetary policy, it seems that policymakers in a number of emerging markets seem content to allow currencies to adjust lower, if this is the price of delivering policy accommodation.

Otherwise, talks pushing for a widespread debt moratorium across the weaker EM countries appear to have hit some resistance, with many private-sector creditors unwilling to extend a helping hand and official sector creditors irked that they should be taking pain when others are allowed to be free-riders.

In a week when private-sector creditors are rejecting the terms of a proposed Argentine debt restructuring, holding out for a better offer, it seems that charity is in short supply. Ultimately, this may mean that we see an increased number of debt restructurings and defaults. It will be interesting to see whether issuers and official sector creditors end up taking a tougher line on private sector bond holders than has been the case to-date.

Generally speaking, we remain more inclined to take positions on the short side with respect to those issuers where restructuring risks are likely to rise, and where bonds still trade at prices close to par, whilst favouring those which have much stronger credit metrics and where we believe restructuring risks are likely to remain very remote.

Looking ahead

Newsflow around the virus will continue to be a focus of market attention over the next several weeks. As rates of death and infection moderate in Europe and the US, a lot of scrutiny will be attached to how these figures may re-accelerate as lockdown is eased.

In this context, a pick-up of cases in Japan and Singapore have recently been a cause for concern and the example of those countries in Asia which have been ‘ahead of the curve’ elsewhere will need to be monitored closely.

What seems increasingly clear to us is that the path back to normal is looking more like a marathon than a sprint. It is becoming clear that the fight against Covid-19 is likely to be a protracted one and one can recall how at the onset of the First World War, there was initially a belief that it would be ‘all over by Christmas’, only for the grim reality of trench warfare to drag on for years to follow.

This isn’t meant to be an overly bleak or pessimistic prognosis, just an admission that as we learn more, we need to accept and understand that it will be some time before life goes back to the way it was up until earlier in the year.

With widespread deployment of a vaccine possibly 12-months away (at best), hopes to contain a second wave may rest on drug treatments being able to improve the prospects for the sickest patients.

For the time being, notwithstanding doubts related to a Chinese trial, it seems that in this dystopian journey we find ourselves in, we are still pinning some hopes on Remdesivir, a drug from Gilead…blessed be the fruit.

Sign up for insights by email

Subscribe now to receive the latest investment and economic insights from our experts, sent straight to your inbox.

This document may be produced and issued by the following entities: in the European Economic Area (EEA), by BlueBay Funds Management Company S.A. (the ManCo), which is regulated by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF). In Germany and Italy, the ManCo is operating under a branch passport pursuant to the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Directive (2009/65/EC) and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (2011/61/EU). In the United Kingdom (UK) by BlueBay Asset Management LLP (BBAM LLP), which is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and is a member of the National Futures Association (NFA) as authorised by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). In United States, by BlueBay Asset Management USA LLC which is registered with the SEC and the NFA. In Switzerland, by BlueBay Asset Management AG where the Representative and Paying Agent is BNP Paribas Securities Services, Paris, succursale de Zurich, Selnaustrasse 16, 8002 Zurich, Switzerland. The place of performance is at the registered office of the Representative. The courts of the registered office of the Swiss representative shall have jurisdiction pertaining to claims in connection with the distribution of shares in Switzerland. The Prospectus, the Key Investor Information Documents (KIIDs), where applicable, the Articles of Incorporation and any other applicable documents required, such as the Annual or Semi-Annual Reports, may be obtained free of charge from the Representative in Switzerland. In Japan, by BlueBay Asset Management International Limited which is registered with the Kanto Local Finance Bureau of Ministry of Finance, Japan. In Australia, BlueBay is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services license under the Corporations Act in respect of financial services as it is regulated by the FCA under the laws of the UK which differ from Australian laws. In Canada, BBAM LLP is not registered under securities laws and is relying on the international dealer exemption under applicable provincial securities legislation, which permits BBAM LLP to carry out certain specified dealer activities for those Canadian residents that qualify as "a Canadian permitted client”, as such term is defined under applicable securities legislation. The BlueBay group entities noted above are collectively referred to as “BlueBay” within this document. The registrations and memberships noted should not be interpreted as an endorsement or approval of BlueBay by the respective licensing or registering authorities. Unless otherwise stated, all data has been sourced by BlueBay. To the best of BlueBay’s knowledge and belief this document is true and accurate at the date hereof. BlueBay makes no express or implied warranties or representations with respect to the information contained in this document and hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of accuracy, completeness or fitness for a particular purpose. Opinions and estimates constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice. BlueBay does not provide investment or other advice and nothing in this document constitutes any advice, nor should be interpreted as such. This document does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase any security or investment product in any jurisdiction and is for information purposes only. This document is intended only for “professional clients” and “eligible counterparties” (as defined by the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MiFID”) ) or in the US by “accredited investors” (as defined in the Securities Act of 1933) or “qualified purchasers” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940) as applicable and should not be relied upon by any other category of customer. No part of this document may be reproduced, redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other person or published, in whole or in part, for any purpose in any manner without the prior written permission of BlueBay. Copyright 2021 © BlueBay, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of RBC and BBAM LLP may be considered to be related and/or connected to RBC and its other affiliates. ® Registered trademark of RBC. RBC GAM is a trademark of RBC. BlueBay Funds Management Company S.A., registered office 4, Boulevard Royal L-2449 Luxembourg, company registered in Luxembourg number B88445. BlueBay Asset Management LLP, registered office 77 Grosvenor Street, London W1K 3JR, partnership registered in England and Wales number OC370085. The term partner refers to a member of the LLP or a BlueBay employee with equivalent standing. Details of members of the BlueBay Group and further important terms which this message is subject to can be obtained at All rights reserved.

Sign up for insights by email

Subscribe now to receive the latest investment and economic insights from our experts, sent straight to your inbox.