While there has been much focus on North Korea as the biggest source of geopolitical risk this year, the Middle East has seen tremendous flux in recent months. This presents a challenge as great as, if not larger than, North Korea for the region’s political risk practitioners and investors, alongside the global economy at large.
Middle Eastern turbulence brings several stories into focus. First there are developments playing out in Syria. Second, Saudi Arabia is undergoing remarkable political and economic change, perhaps linked therein to a third factor – the continuing battle for regional supremacy between Saudi Arabia and Iran. We can add to this the long-running struggle between Israel and its neighbours; the Kurdish problem, plus fall out from mixed outcomes from the Arab spring in Egypt, Libya, and Tunisia; US disengagement from the region and Russia looking to fill the vacuum.
What is clear is that the Middle East is a region with many moving parts and potential conflict points.
Unlike North Korea, it is pivotal to the global economy, given its importance to energy supplies and its status within international capital markets.
The rise of the radical crown prince
In understanding the region, Saudi Arabia provides a good place to start, and the topic of the moment is the truly meteoric rise of Crown Prince Mohammed bin-Salman (MBS) to become heir apparent to aged King Salman.
MBS’ rise reflects a fundamental change in the model of succession from brothers, to down the line of sons.
On the plus side, MBS is offering more decisive government and a focus on addressing key underlying structural weaknesses in the country. This includes reform of the economy, the influence of religion over the nation, and also social factors with a focus on the role of women in society.
Saudi Arabia has the balance sheet for this vision to be realised (US$490 billion in FX reserves, a low debt ratio and state-owned assets to sell). But the revolutionary nature of the change suggests that risks are likely to come from vested interests (royal princes and the old religious establishment). MBS’ own relative lack of experience at 32 years of age also raises question marks for some as to how he will manage the delicate nature of palace politics alongside challenging foreign affairs.
Home reform versus growing toxicity
Creating a strong domestic economy is one part of the longer-term strategy of MBS and Saudi Arabia in confronting what it would likely describe as the number-one geopolitical threat: the rise of Shia Iran and the battle for religious and geographic supremacy in the region.
Saudi-Iran schism is building momentum, and we have an inexperienced Saudi administration feeling increasingly threatened and encircled by Iran, but willing to take a more interventionist/confrontational approach. Israel also likely feels uncomfortable with the growing strength of Iran and Hezbollah against its borders, especially coming out of Lebanon. All this comes as US leadership in the region is in a state of flux, resulting in a toxic, unstable mix emerging in the Middle East.
For an extended version of the text, please download the document
Download article: Conflict points and moving parts: Middle East update
This document is issued in the United Kingdom (UK) by BlueBay Asset Management LLP (BlueBay), which is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and is a member of the National Futures Association (NFA). Past performance is not indicative of future results. All data has been sourced by BlueBay. To the best of BlueBay’s knowledge and belief this document is true and accurate at the date hereof. BlueBay makes no express or implied warranties or representations with respect to the information contained in this document and hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of accuracy, completeness or fitness for a particular purpose. This document is intended for “professional clients” and “eligible counterparties” (as defined by the FCA) only and should not be relied upon by any other category of customer. Except where agreed explicitly in writing, BlueBay does not provide investment or other advice and nothing in this document constitutes any advice, nor should be interpreted as such. No BlueBay Fund will be offered, except pursuant and subject to the offering memorandum and subscription materials (the "Offering Materials"). If there is an inconsistency between this document and the Offering Materials for the BlueBay Fund, the provisions in the Offering Materials shall prevail. You should read the Offering Materials carefully before investing in any BlueBay fund. This document does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase any security or investment product in any jurisdiction and is for information purposes only. No part of this document may be reproduced in any manner without the prior written permission of BlueBay Asset Management LLP. Copyright 2017 © BlueBay, the investment manager, advisor and global distributor of the BlueBay Funds, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Royal Bank of Canada and the BlueBay Funds may be considered to be related and/or connected issuers to Royal Bank of Canada and its other affiliates. ® Registered trademark of Royal Bank of Canada. RBC Global Asset Management is a trademark of Royal Bank of Canada. BlueBay Asset Management LLP, registered office 77 Grosvenor Street, London W1K 3JR, partnership registered in England and Wales number OC370085.
Published November 2017